Tuesday, December 6, 2011

CREATING THE JFNA CULTURE

From Day one of what is now JFNA, there has been the expressed desire to create a "new culture" -- one distinct from those of CJF and UJA. Well, friends, kal ha'kavod, the "JFNA culture" has emerged. Unfortunately, it is a culture of arrogance, a culture of immunity from any and all criticism, a culture of the thin skin. Worst of all, it is a culture free of accountability...and we, the donors and federations have only ourselves to blame.

Charles Bronfman and Jeffrey Solomon recently responded, in a special Wall Street Journal section on Philanthropy to the question: Should Philanthropies Operate Like Businesses? Their answer: ...to have a sustained and strategic impact, philanthropy must be conducted like business -- with discipline, strategy and a strong focus on outcomes. Organizations receiving your support should be as accountable to you as a company's board is to its shareholders...

This all seems so obvious. In your community and mine, we "focus on outcomes" and accountability is paramount. Yet, when it comes to our national organization, it is as if outcomes are irrelevant and there is no one...no one...demanding accountability. One would think that JFNA is nothing more than a "mom and pop store" -- a $30 million a year "mom and pop store."

How else does one explain that JFNA could convene a Tribefest, lose $253,000 (before overhead costs), not a question is asked publicly, there is no accounting, and a second Tribefest is placed on the Calendar with no budget? Or, where is the accounting for a $250,000 loss on the 2010 New Orleans GA? How are these debts to the organization being repaid?

More to the point, why are you silent? Where is the federations' demand for JFNA accountability? Perhaps one-on-one, if at all? Are we fearful of "offending" the powers that be, of making waves? By our silence we have encouraged more of the same and there is no one telling JFNA's lay and professional leaders that this behavior must stop.

I have to laugh each time I read the Draft Budget (that none of us are supposed to see) with its claims of monitoring results and accountability. These have becoming throwaway phrases without meaning -- like "robust debate" and "dynamic programs."

Friends, it is long past time for JFNA to be held to the same standard of accountability as are our federations. Or do we just not care?

Rwexler

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

JFNA's culture is sick. Paranoid, secretive, bizarre. Good for you, RW, for keeping the lens on those who lead it.

Anonymous said...

You answered your own question. They do not care. We are all stupid. I agree with your friend Ploni, we need a JFNA Planning Table. That will straighten them out...and raise more money for JFNA...

paul jeser said...

For reasons that Richard and others point out, and for many other external reasons, there will never be a Fed system like there was in the 'good ole days.' There needs to be a completely new system built, from the top down and from the bottom up. Here is one possibility: http://ujtheeandme.blogspot.com/2010/07/federations-are-deadthe-jeser-approach.html

Anonymous said...

You don't correct the situation by attacking it. You prove it's irrelevance by creating alternative cooperative ventures among Federations.

Anonymous said...

JFNA has gone to hell in a handbasket. Long time employees are treated badly, as though pushing them to walk so JFNA does not have to pay their severance. Despicable.

Anonymous said...

The one thing NEWCO in all ite regimes has institutionalized is how to shun and degrade out of favor professionals. That it is tolerated by it's supposed owners is an open shandeh.

Used to be important said...

In the "good(not so)old days",it seemed that accountability and outcomes were at the soul of the incredible UJA and Federation leaders who understood they were part of something out of the ordinary; something a little larger than life; something that was not run as a business but as an act of love and of collective responsibility. The staffs of UJA and CJF and their excellent lay financial committe leaders attended to the business aspects well. I recall our system getting the best ratings, year after year, from those who examine that stuff.
For reasons that seem to make little sense now, a whole bunch of people thought they needed to change it all and they made what was extraordinary, very ordinary.
To change it back will take Leadership. It has always taken leadership. Rich, you're one of the best and you still know and can reach most of the people who could help make it happen. There are many of us out here who'd be willing to assist.